AI projects tend to stall on the same three things: an unclear goal, data nobody has checked, and no one placed to judge the technical work. Bay Information Systems, an independent AI consultancy in the UK, asks these ten questions at the start of every engagement, in roughly this order.
How does the assessment work?
Ten questions, about five minutes. Choose an answer to see guidance on it and a link to further reading; you can change an answer at any time, and the result updates as you go. Seven questions are scored, and three shape the advice without affecting the score. We record which answers are chosen, without any name or contact details; those reach us only if you use one of the forms at the end.
The questions
(Answers are recorded without your name or email address, and may be used in aggregate statistics. Details are in the privacy notice.)
1. What do you want AI to do for your organisation?
A specific problem with a measurable outcome
This is where scoping starts. Put a value on the outcome next, so that scope, budget and the decision to continue can all be weighed against it.
A common position. List the tasks and decisions that take the most time or money, and who repeats them each week; the first use case is usually on that list.
Then it may not be the right time, which is a valid conclusion.
Your results
Scoring runs in your browser and needs JavaScript. The printable checklist below lists every question and answer.
What next?
Three options, in order of commitment. (What we collect is set out in the privacy notice.)
Keep reading
The articles linked from your answers:
What does an AI readiness assessment cover?
An AI readiness assessment checks whether an organisation has what an AI project needs before any money is spent on one. The questions run in a fixed order because each answer limits the next.
The goal comes first. A problem with a value on it sets the budget, the scope and the point at which to stop, and without one nothing later in the assessment can be weighed. The data comes second: where it lives, whether anyone knows what it contains, and whether it is sensitive. Sensitivity decides where a model can run, and so which tools are available at all (personal data under UK GDPR, client confidentiality and regulated records each narrow the choice). The people come third: who can judge whether technical work is good, and whether an earlier project stalled. The last questions cover measurement, what happens to the output, and what a year of waiting would cost.
Technology has no question of its own. It follows from the answers.
How do you run an AI readiness assessment internally?
The questions work as a meeting agenda. Answer them for one use case at a time, since a goal that is clear for one team is often vague for another, and bring three people: whoever owns the problem, whoever knows the data, and whoever would build or buy the system. Where they disagree on an answer, write both down.
The answers about data need checking against the data itself. "Mostly in one system" remains a claim until someone pulls a sample and counts the gaps, and that check usually takes longer than the meeting. Answers of "not sure" or "we haven't thought about it" are findings in their own right; they mark the work to do before any build. (The printable version below serves as a template for the meeting.)
How does it differ from an AI audit?
The two terms are used loosely, and some providers sell one under the other's name. On this site, an AI audit examines AI already in use (which tools staff use, what data reaches them, whether a deployed system does what it was bought to do), and a readiness assessment examines a decision that has not yet been made. They meet at the questions on current use and sensitivity: data already pasted into a chat tool is an audit finding and a readiness constraint at once.
What does a consultant-led assessment add?
This page gives a score and guidance on each answer. The paid version, an AI roadmap, covers the same ground in more depth: one week, interviews with three key people, a direct look at the data, and independent judgement on any technical claims. It produces a short written roadmap setting out the goal in business terms, what is at stake, a phased plan with a fixed price and a go, adjust or stop decision after each phase, and what not to do. The roadmap costs £8,000, fixed and agreed before work starts (the forms below reach us directly, and the first conversation is free).
Can I print the questions as a template?
Yes. The version below lists every question with the points for each answer. Questions marked "no points" change the advice without changing the score.
What do you want AI to do for your organisation?
[ ] A specific problem with a measurable outcome (2)
[ ] We know the area, but not the exact problem (1)
[ ] There is pressure to "do something with AI" (0)
Where does the relevant data live?
[ ] Mostly in one system (2)
[ ] Several systems that don't talk to each other (1)
[ ] Spreadsheets, documents and inboxes (1)
[ ] Mostly in people's heads (0)
Do you know what's in your data?
[ ] Yes; it's documented, and we know its gaps (2)
[ ] Roughly, but nobody has written it down (1)
[ ] No (0)
Is any of the data sensitive? (no points)
[ ] No
[ ] Personal data about customers, members or staff
[ ] Confidential to clients, or commercially sensitive
[ ] Regulated (health, financial, legal) or security-related
How do you use AI today? (no points)
[ ] Not at all
[ ] Staff use chat tools individually (ChatGPT, Copilot, Claude)
[ ] Connected to our systems or data (connectors, agents)
[ ] We've built something custom
Who can judge whether technical work is good?
[ ] An in-house lead with AI or data experience (2)
[ ] A technical team that's new to AI (1)
[ ] An outside vendor or agency (1)
[ ] No one (0)
Has an AI or data project stalled before? (no points)
[ ] No, this is our first
[ ] Yes; it stalled or was abandoned
[ ] Yes; it's live, but disappointing
How will you know if it works?
[ ] We have an agreed measure and a way to check it (2)
[ ] Staff will try it and tell us (1)
[ ] We haven't thought about it (0)
What should happen with the AI's output?
[ ] It triggers an action in a system or workflow (2)
[ ] People read it to inform decisions (1)
[ ] Not sure (0)
What happens if you do nothing for a year?
[ ] We can put a number on it (2)
[ ] It gets worse, but we haven't costed it (1)
[ ] Not much (0)
Score out of 14:
0-5, foundations first; 6-10, ready to test; 11-14, ready to build.
www.bayis.co.uk/ai-readiness-assessment.html
Frequently asked questions
What is AI readiness?
AI readiness is whether an organisation has what an AI project needs before it starts: a defined problem with a value on it, data that is known and reachable, someone able to judge the technical work, and a way to tell whether the result works. The choice of technology comes later and depends on those four.
How long does a full assessment take?
It depends on how many systems hold the relevant data and how many people we need to speak to. We agree the length and the fee in writing before any work starts.
What does a full assessment cost?
The first conversation is free. The assessment itself is fixed price, agreed before it starts.
What do we receive?
A data strategy: a short document setting out your situation, the goal in business terms, what is at stake if the work goes wrong, a phased plan with a fixed price and a go, adjust or stop decision after each phase, and what we recommend not doing. It is the same document our data strategy consulting work produces, scoped to the AI decision in front of you.
Are my answers sent anywhere?
We record which answers are chosen, without any name or contact details, to see how the assessment is used. Your contact details, and your answers linked to them, reach us only if you use one of the forms at the end.
left to answer.
All questions answered. The reading list below collects the articles linked from your answers.